Les Stroud's "Survivorman" vs. Bear Grylls' "Man Vs. Wild"
Manliness of main character (10 points)
Camera work and production values (10 points)
Usefulness of survival advice (10 points)
Overall realism of show (20 points).
Category 1: Manliness of main character
Stroud comes out strong in the manliness department because in his show, he's in the wild for a full week rather than a mere 48 hours. He's also alone with no crew, making the ordeal that much more difficult.
Grylls, on the other hand, is much more daring and balsy when it comes to what he decides to do on the show. He goes out of his way to eat absurdly disgusting foods, ascend and descend absurdly dangerous cliffs, and he also makes sure to involve large dead mammals as food and/or clothing in most of his episodes; a manly decision there is no greater.
Digging deeper into their pre-show lives, we find that Grylls pulls ahead for manliness. According to Wikipedia, he's paramotored over the Himalayas (I don't know what that means but it soun...