Day 158
Sometimes we fancy ourselves hipocrites, becase we're willing to act morally in some situations but not others, even when the respectve situations are nearly identical. We're happy to help our friends, or loved ones, or even a stranger if that stranger is right in front of us, but we couldn't care less about the ubiquitous starving Africans.
I don't think this makes anybody a moral criminal. It is difficult, if not impossible to muster empathy when knows absolutely nothing about those individuals for whom he empathizes, let alone a group of indviduals characterized as such. Isn't the notion of empathizing with a group of people self-contradictory? It is no wonder we don't care all too much.
So let's call people what they really are. I don't hesitate to admire somebody when he or she stands up for a family member or friends over a stranger. It's how we stay cohesive as families, friends, an communities. The "world community," I suspect, will always work morally much the same way it works economically and politically: as a set of power relationships in which there are winners and losers. The entitlements are always arbitrary.
I don't think this makes anybody a moral criminal. It is difficult, if not impossible to muster empathy when knows absolutely nothing about those individuals for whom he empathizes, let alone a group of indviduals characterized as such. Isn't the notion of empathizing with a group of people self-contradictory? It is no wonder we don't care all too much.
So let's call people what they really are. I don't hesitate to admire somebody when he or she stands up for a family member or friends over a stranger. It's how we stay cohesive as families, friends, an communities. The "world community," I suspect, will always work morally much the same way it works economically and politically: as a set of power relationships in which there are winners and losers. The entitlements are always arbitrary.
Comments
However, I have to repudiate the generalization inherent in your last sentence. Arbitrary power relations will only persist as long as the people who benefit unfairly under them are determined to remain ignorant of the consequences. Your depressing fatalism here seems somewhat out of character. I thought you also reject the notion, as I do, that the 'international community' must be reduced to a matter of economic/political mechanisms which are beyond anyone's individual influence.