- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Day 66
I remember quite well when the world's best chess player finally fell to a computer opponent. It was 1997, and although the tournament was close and quite controvercial, it was clear the computer had caught up to humanity. A few of the guys in the philosophy department believe that this, in a way, has ruined the game. They very much dislike the notion that no matter how good one ever gets, it can be beaten by a program running on a processor of ones and zeros. I too find this discouraging, but the game is still a great deal of fun. There is something artistic about the game. It very much is the case in countless different positions that there are two 'equally good' possible moves. It isn't even beyond computer intelligence to choose moves according to a particular style of play (whether it be aggressive, defensive, etc). Will this always be so? Will some computer 100 years from now completely deconstruct the game into every possible position and every possible best move...
Comments